Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Draft article for GPs

I have been asked to write a short article on CLL for GPs and palliative care staff. Here is the first draft. Any comments?

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the commonest type of leukaemia in Europe and North America. It has an incidence of between 4 and 5 per 100,000 in the general population and the median age of presentation is 70, though occasional patients as young as 20 are seen and the disease becomes commoner still in very old age. It is about twice as common in men as women and much less common in individuals with African and especially East Asian ethnicity. The cause is unknown, though in 5-10 percent of cases there is a family history of CLL or other lymphoid neoplasm. American authorities have recognised exposure to the defoliant, Agent Orange, in Viet Nam as justification for receiving compensation.

There is a long history of changes in the definition of the condition and the latest World Health Organisation classification couples it with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), a histologically and immunologically identical condition without overspill into the blood, as a single entity, CLL/SLL.

There are many causes of chronic lymphocytosis and CLL cannot be definitively diagnosed without the aid of flow cytometry to detect the range of marker molecules on the surface of the leukaemia cells. They should first be monoclonal, defined for simplicity by the presence of only one immunoglobulin light chain type – either kappa or lambda, but not both – on the cell surface. The following markers should also be present: CD5, CD19, CD20 and CD23. Expression of surface immunoglobulin, CD79b and CD20 is usually less dense than is normally found on normal B lymphocytes and the antibody, FMC7, which detects an epitope of CD20, usually fails to react. There are, however, atypical cases with aberrant markers that require expert diagnosis, which should be available from the laboratory performing the assay.

All cases of CLL are now known to be tumours of B lymphocytes. Previous reports of T-lymphocyte CLL are now known to refer either to cases of T-prolymphocytic leukaemia of to cases of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia. Other conditions that cause diagnostic difficulties include splenic marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and polyclonal B-cell lymphocytosis.

Since all cases of CLL have to be diagnosed by flow cytometry, it has been possible to refine further the diagnosis. Rather surprisingly, it was found in 2002 that one normal individual in thirty over the age of 40 has a population of cells identical to CLL cells in his or her blood, and in people who have a family history of CLL the prevalence of this monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is nearer one in seven. In some cases the population is tiny and only detectable by careful scrutiny, but in sizeable numbers the population is easily detectable by routine blood count, and many individuals have been told that they have leukaemia. Since individuals with MBL have only an annual risk of one in a hundred of their condition becoming CLL they have, in my opinion, been worried unnecessarily.

In order to prevent this new Guidelines have been produced by the International Workshop (IW) on CLL which require the presence of at least 5 x 109 B lymphocytes/L in the peripheral blood to make the diagnosis of CLL. Fewer lymphocytes than this establishes the diagnosis of MBL, or SLL if there is lymph node enlargement.

CLL is staged according to the Binet system in Europe and the Rai system in North America. (Table 1) Both depend on the clinical assessment of tumour bulk and the laboratory assessment of the degree of bone marrow suppression reflected in anaemia and thrombocytopenia. The natural history of the condition depends on the pace of progression. Staging tells us how far that progression has gone. Since CLL may be asymptomatic at first, many patients, three-quarters in one series, are diagnosed by a blood test done for something else entirely. Rate of progression was formerly only assessable by measuring the rate of increase of lymphocyte count. A decade ago it was discovered that the biological nature of the leukaemia determined progression rates.

As a B-lymphocyte matures it rearranges its immunoglobulin genes so as to eventually produce an antibody that fits best to its target antigen. The final rearrangement takes place in germinal centres of lymph nodes and is known as somatic mutation. The degree of somatic mutation is thought to influence cell signalling through receptor molecules. It turns out that patients whose CLL is derived from somatically mutated lymphocytes have a much more benign prognosis than those derived from unmutated cells, with a median survival of 25 years against 8 years. in clinical trials, mutational analysis also predicts the length of remission attainable. Unfortunately, this test, though standardised and much cheaper than a single course of chemotherapy, is only available from a few specialised centres and is mainly used for clinical trials. Surrogate tests using flow cytometry, such as CD38 or ZAP-70 levels are much less reliable.

All patients with CLL have impaired immunity. In two thirds of patients there is hypogammaglobulinaemia, but even in untreated stage A patients there is a reduced response to vaccinations. The immunodeficiency is complex and involves both B cell and T cell arms of the immune response. It never recovers, even after treatment; indeed treatment can make it much worse and render the patient susceptible to unusual viral and fungal infections. Impaired immune surveillance is also blamed for an apparent increase in second malignancies, especially those with an obvious viral origin such as Merckel cell tumours. As far as the common carcinomas are concerned the picture is confused because of so many confounding variables.

An ominous form of progression in CLL is the development of Richter’s syndrome, usually a diffuse large B cell lymphoma though some authors include aggressive forms of Hodgkin’s disease or even T-cell lymphomas within the definition. It is now clear that although some forms of Richter’s disease involve transformation of the CLL clone, others are quite separate B-cell tumours.

Another well-recognised form of progression is prolymphocytoid transformation. This is also a confused area. CLL does not transform into prolymphocytic leukaemia, which is a quite separate disease, but may accumulate increased numbers of prolymphocytes in the blood. Sometimes this is a transient phenomenon associated with infection or even vaccination, sometimes it is a stable state, often previously overlooked and frequently associated with the presence of the chromosomal abnormality, trisomy 12. In less than a third of instances it may represent an aggressive change in the nature of the leukaemia.

Paradoxically, as well as immune deficiency, patients with CLL experience autoimmune complications. Most commonly, it is autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), which occurs in about 15 per cent of patients, while CLL is itself the commonest known cause of AIHA. Exactly why AIHA is so common in CLL has not been worked out completely, but it is known that it can be triggered by treatment, particularly with the drug, fludarabine, and it is commoner in late stage, multiply-treated disease. Of other types of autoimmune disease, immune thrombocytopenia occurs in about 2 per cent of patients (in one third accompanied by AIHA) and paraneoplastic pemphigus, though even rarer, may also be triggered by fludarabine treatment.

Management

There is no indication for treating CLL merely because it is there. Early trials demonstrated that there was no benefit to the patient from early treatment. A ‘watch and wait’ approach is generally adopted, though patients often call it ‘wait and worry’. Indications for beginning treatment are given in Table 2.

CLL will usually respond well to a variety of drug treatments and it is usual for patients to receive several rounds of chemotherapy, which depending on response may be repeated or varied. Until recently there was no evidence that the order which treatment was given in affected the eventual outcome. However, the CLL 8 trial of the German CLL Study Group has clearly demonstrated a superiority of the combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) over the previous best buy (FC) in terms of overall survival. The large size and well-conducted nature of this randomized controlled trial makes it believable by most haematologist, and measures are being taken for this to become standard therapy, even in countries where the monoclonal antibody, rituximab, was thought too expensive for CLL by regulatory authorities.

The median age for patients entered in this trial was only 61, but patients who were over-65 and over-70 did just as well as the younger individuals. What was crucial was performance status. Other phase II studies have suggested that older patients, especially those with co-morbidities would find difficulties in withstanding the rigours of FCR.

Other agents currently used for treatment include chlorambucil, bendamustine, high dose steroids, lenalidomide, and the monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab and ofatumumab. In many countries some of these agents are only available on clinical trials. Interpretation of some clinical trials involving these agents is complex, but chlorambucil is a very safe, cheap and well-tested agent with a reasonable success profile for older patients with co-morbidities, and early phase II data suggest that its effect may be enhanced by combining it with rituximab. With chlorambucil dose is important and in many comparative trials an inadvertently chosen low dose seems to have been used. A dose of 70 mg/m2 every 28 days is recommended.

Trials have shown that certain chromosomal abnormalities predict poor response to standard therapies. Deletions at 11q23, which sometimes involve the ATM gene are associated with poor responses and short remissions following standard chemotherapy, but the addition of rituximab to the cocktail remedies this. Deletions at 17p or mutations of the critical gene at this site (TP53) predicts very poor response to most treatments including FCR. This lesion should be tested for by fluorescent in-situ hybridisation (FISH) before beginning any new therapy. Agents that may be suitable for such patients include high dose steroids, alemtuzumab, flavopiridol and lenalidomide. However, if eligible, such patients should be considered for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Such a procedure may be performed up to the age of seventy, but carries a high mortality and morbidity.

Supportive care

Often the best support a patient can be given is to remove the inappropriate label of ‘leukaemia’ that has been attached. Patients may need to be supported through autoimmune complications and marrow failure, but the commonest cause of death in CLL is infection. Intravenous immunoglobulin in fusions are recommended for patients with serum IgG levels less than 3g/L who have suffered more than one serious bacterial infection in one year. Prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended except to cover short periods of neutropenia or specific treatments that reduce T cell levels, such as treatment with purine analogues (fludarabine, cladribine or pentostatin) or alemtuzumab. Such patients require prophylaxis against herpes viruses, fungal infections and Pneumocystis jirovecii. Patients receiving alemtuzumab should be screened for reactivation of cytomegalovirus and started on gancyclovir should reactivation occur.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dr Hamblin - why do you suggest removing the term leukemia? My GP told me I had the good cancer and it would make no difference to my life - I felt enormously betrayed when it progressed in 6 months, I had frequent infections, night sweats and needed treatment. If my GP hadn't thought it was leukemia and therefore of clinical importance he would never have sent me for a second opinion and things would have become worse. He said he had lots of patients with CLL and it never progressed - fine, but not for me!

Terry Hamblin said...

I'm not talking about people like you. I'm talking about people with MBL who have been mistakenly labelled CLL. If his MBL patients hadn't been so labelled he would never have called it the 'good cancer'.

Jorge said...

Prof Terry Hamblin
Thank you so much.You are a CLL expert and it is grateful for us to see your important articles.
Jorge

Anonymous said...

tleThank you for putting the Kappa/Lamba skew at the beginning of the article. If you are targeting this article to readers in the United States, the use of the word "commonest" is not a good idea. "Most common", or some variation on that theme is (get this) considered better English. The sentence that starts "With Chlorambucil dose...", the word "with" should be "what". Excellent start, and thank you for this effort to reach GPs.

peisenberg said...

Thanks for creating such an easy to read and comprehensive article. My 74 year old mom was recently diagnosed. I am using this time to become educated about relevant tests and treatments. One question: What is the name of the test that is used to determine a patient's CLL is derived from somatically mutated lymphocytes?

Terry Hamblin said...

Yes, the language still divides, doesn't it. It is actually targeted at an English publication which prefers 'commonest' and 'commoner'. The other sentence should be "With chlorambucil, dose is important..." I left the comma out. Thanks for the heads-up on the confusion.

There is a story that Winston Churchill was awoken in America by a man on the telephone who told him, "I am the president of the English-Speaking Union." to which Churchill replied, "I don't believe it." He replaced the phone handset.

Comunication has to be designed for the reader and listener, not for the writer or speaker. A great Chines sage once said for peace in the world I would have people understand what I am saying not what they hear.

Terry Hamblin said...

peisenberg

IGHV mutational analysis

Anonymous said...

Dear Doctor Hamblin,

Regarding the 4th paragraph and the 1st sentence, could the words "There are many causes of chronic lymphocytosis and" be safely deleted? I found that they've made the first sentence a bit confusing and, in addition, the words do not seem necessary for the rest of the paragraph.

You amaze me, Dr. Hamblin ..... always working for the benefit of the patient, this time through educating physicians.

Hugs from the Buskell home in Southwest Virginia

Terry Hamblin said...

Yes I am revising it now. I have to lose a couple of hundred words which I am doing by constructing some tables.

Anonymous said...

Suggestions:

1. In order to prevent this[put a comma here; otherwise it reads oddly] new Guidelines have been produced

2. Until recently there was no evidence that the order which treatment was given in[remove this word] affected the eventual outcome.

3. The large size and well-conducted nature of this randomized controlled trial makes it believable by most haematologist[add s]

Thank you for your help on the ACOR list. When I was diagnosed, all I heard was "leukemia" which was very frightening. The information you gave on that list helped me relax.

Anonymous said...

Hi Dr. Hamblin,

Thank you very much for all that you do for our community. I hope you are recovering and feeling better these days. Here are a couple of things that I noticed.. I hope you don't think I am being too picky. Also, I am unsure of the differences between proper English and American English, so my suggestions may not be appropriate. Also, Microsoft Word flagged quite a few words as being spelled incorectly, but I just assumed that was a difference between our versions of English.. :):):)

I think this sentence "Since individuals with MBL have only an annual risk of one in a hundred of their condition becoming CLL they have, in my opinion, been worried unnecessarily." needs an additional comma to read, "Since individuals with MBL have only an annual risk of one in a hundred of their condition becoming CLL, they have, in my opinion, been worried unnecessarily."

I think this sentence "In order to prevent this new Guidelines have been produced by the International Workshop..." needs an additional comma "In order to prevent this, new Guidelines have been produced by the International Workshop...".

I think this part "with a median survival of 25 years against 8 years. in clinical trials, mutational analysis..." needs the word "in" to be capitalized, so that it reads, "with a median survival of 25 years against 8 years. In clinical trials, mutational analysis.."

I think this sentence "As far as the common carcinomas are concerned the picture is confused because of so many confounding variables." needs a comma to become, "As far as the common carcinomas are concerned, the picture is confused because of so many confounding variables."

I think this sentence "Other phase II studies have suggested that older patients, especially those with co-morbidities would find difficulties in withstanding the rigours of FCR." needs an additional comma, "Other phase II studies have suggested that older patients, especially those with co-morbidities, would find difficulties in withstanding the rigours of FCR."

Dr. Hamblin, Thank you again for all that you do!!! You are very much loved by our CLL community!!!!

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the clearest and most concise explanation of CLL, its complications, and treatments that I have ever read.

I especially appreciate your statement: "Fewer lymphocytes than this establishes the diagnosis of MBL, or SLL if there is lymph node enlargement."

After years of living with enlarging lymph nodes (some remained enlarged after mononucleosis at age 16, and others remained so after shingles at age 45), but with "normal" CBC's, I thought for many years that my widespread adenopathy was just a characteristic of being me, and certainly not a disease. I didn't feel sick! It wasn't until the adenopathy in my neck became much more noticeable, along with enlarged tonsils at age 53, that I decided to seek medical advice. I never expected to see "CLL/SLL" on the lab report after a lymph node biopsy. I then struggled with the difference between CLL and SLL, until my bone marrow began to show involvement.

Thanks again for your good work, and take care.

Doug in New Mexico.

Anonymous said...

RE:
"Fewer lymphocytes than this establishes the diagnosis of MBL, or SLL if there is lymph node enlargement."
May bone marrow involvement without lymph node enlargement still be diagnosed as SLL?
RE:
"They should first be monoclonal, defined for simplicity by the presence of only one immunoglobulin light chain type – either kappa or lambda, but not both – on the cell surface."
What may the presence of both kappa and lambda chains indicate?

This overview is a valuable contribution to understanding CLL; thank you, Dr. Hamblin.

Anonymous said...

Well I suppose that the GP isn't going to treat the CLL, so your new-found enthusiasm for FCR won't mess up too many people.

I'd like to see you note that patients are best served when they don't listen to their community oncologist, but see a true CLL specialist. Though it might be one of the more common forms of leukemia, along with MDS, it is defined as a rare cancer.

I don't think too many people would let the kid fresh out of medical school transplant a heart into them; nor should they make decisions about CLL and treatments w/o being seen by a real expert.

Sisyphus said...

Doctor, I was diagnosed w/CLL 11 years ago. I have the 13q deletion & the IgVH gene mutation test showed I am mutated. Yet, my hg recently dropped to 7.0 & a transfusion bumped me up to 10.2. Platelets dropped to 111,000 & are now 133,000. Is this sufficient information for you to hazard a guess as to why my numbers dropped given the favorable prognostic indicators? What are the odds they will drop again? I am chemo-naive and inclined to run out the clock. Thank you. P.S. I don't think you really understand Catholics.

Terry Hamblin said...

There are usually reasons why problems arise in a minority of people with good prognostic markers. I would need more information to comment. Please comment on Catholics on one of the articles on religion. I respect Catholics and some of my best friends are Catholic, but I believe that Catholicism had departed from the true faith in places. However, I am keen to be told why I am wrong if I am wrong.