tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19490962.post4854697300413585423..comments2023-12-10T10:06:41.979+00:00Comments on mutations of mortality: More scientific fraudTerry Hamblinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06346629921055055879noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19490962.post-52057208832245105512010-08-22T16:00:16.911+01:002010-08-22T16:00:16.911+01:00It's not plagiarism to cite your source and qu...It's not plagiarism to cite your source and quote from it. All you have to do is click on the words "now surface" and you can see the whole article. No deceit there I think.Terry Hamblinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06346629921055055879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19490962.post-50794825787607308632010-08-22T15:43:16.552+01:002010-08-22T15:43:16.552+01:00Plagiarism in a post on fraud. Nice.
From the Bos...Plagiarism in a post on fraud. Nice.<br /><br />From the Boston Globe (http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2010/08/10/author_on_leave_after_harvard_inquiry/?page=2)<br /><br />This isn’t the first time Hauser’s work has been challenged.<br /><br />In 1995, he was the lead author of a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that looked at whether cotton-top tamarins are able to recognize themselves in a mirror. Self-recognition was something that set humans and other primates, such as chimpanzees and orangutans, apart from other animals, and no one had shown that monkeys had this ability.<br /><br />Gordon G. Gallup Jr., a professor of psychology at State University of New York at Albany, questioned the results and requested videotapes that Hauser had made of the experiment.Crownoreply@blogger.com